Skip to content

rig vs make / just

make, just, and similar task runners are recipe-first: you write the commands, they run them. rig is convention-first: it already knows what build, test, run, and format mean in .NET, Node, Go, and Rust, so there's nothing to write to get started.

make / justrig
ModelYou define every recipeBuilt-in verbs, detected per ecosystem
Zero-config startNo — empty repo does nothingYes — rig build works immediately
Cross-ecosystemYou write per-project recipesSame verb, right native command everywhere
Discoveryrig info shows what it found; Node scripts become verbs
Custom commandsThe whole pointcommands in .rig.json (shell / argv / per-OS)
Coverage / kill / doctorHand-rolledFirst-class verbs

Not actually rivals

The honest framing: rig and just solve overlapping but different problems. just is a great command memory — a place to park the project-specific incantations that have no convention. rig handles the conventional dev loop (build/test/run/format/coverage) so you don't write recipes for the things every project already does the same way.

In practice they compose: let rig own the standard verbs, and put genuinely bespoke tasks in .rig.json's commands (which gives you per-OS variants, env, and cwd) — or keep a justfile alongside if you prefer. rig doesn't try to be your whole automation layer; it tries to make the 90% case need no configuration at all.

Released under the MIT License.